Congressional Testimony
Democracy & Public Schools
Dropouts
Economic Stimulus Package
Education & Jobs
Federal Education Programs
High School Exit Examinations
Improving Public Schools
International Studies
No Child Left Behind
Public Engagement
Public School Facts
Rethinking the Federal Role
Special Education
Standards-Based Educ. Reform
State Testing Data
Student Achievement
Teachers
Testing
Title I
Vouchers
Violence & Crime in Schools
Virtual Schools

If you have trouble viewing documents on the Center on Education Policy web site, please:

• Make sure you are using the latest Adobe Reader (version 9 or later).

Clear your web browser's cache and cookies.

• If you clear your web browser's cache and cookies, and confirm that you are using the latest version of Adobe Reader, and are still unable to view documents or pages on the Center on Education Policy web site, please contact the CEP web support team. We will assist you promptly.

Document Library

Results:  1 Document

Sort By: Publication Date  |  Title  |  Author
Behind the Numbers: Interviews in 22 States about Achievement Data and the No Child Left Behind Act Policies (Report - Full)
Author(s): Lisa E. Kroger, Hilary L. Campbell, Arthur A. Thacker, D.E. "Sunny" Becker, and Lauress L. Wise
This report describes findings from a series of interviews with education leaders in 22 states. These interviews were conducted with the intent of providing a context for better understanding the achievement trends identified in CEP's June 2007 report, Answering the Question That Matters Most: Has Student Achievement Increased Since No Child Left Behind? Several key findings that emerged from the interviews: (1) there is limited research-based evidence that corroborates or explains achievement trends or monitors instructional impact; (2) many states have made changes in their testing systems since NCLB took effect in 2002, often in ways that have caused "breaks" in the compatibility of test data and made it invalid to track trends over several years; (3) many states are actively pursuing additional changes in their assessment systems that will continue to affect the comparability of test data in the future, and many states indicated that they intend to increase the amount of test data available to the public; and (4) almost half of the states interviewed emphasized the need for federal technical assistance (and often funding) to help states and school districts develop the capacity to collect and analyze the complex assessment and other data required by NCLB.
Published: October 15, 2007 View:  Full Report

CE version REL-7.0.0.0w © 2010 CitySoft, Inc.
Powered by CitySoft Community Enterprise